Vegetarianism.
Just because animal feelings are closer to ours doesn't make them worth anything.
What is objectively more vital and important?
A bear or a tree?
A chinese man, or the rice he grows?
A politician, or a tomato?
It's an absurd question.
It doesn't have a correct answer.
At what point exactly is eating veggies better than eating animals?
Veggies don't have feelings? Hardly so. They do. We just don't understand them.
It's proven. If you talk to flower it grows faster. Literally. The biochemical processes in flowers are somehow aligned with sound frequencies. And doesn't this "somehow" exactly follow the definition of feelings?
Ok, so let's assume we don't want to hurt the flowers either.
We can only eat shit then.
But shit is a fertilizer for a plants. Some plants would die without it.
It would be like taking water from Africans.
So what do we do now? We die?
Do some of us really rather kill themselves, than anything else?
Knowing anything else would kill them without a blink of an eye?
Is conscience a life-saver for humans, or their ultimate weakness?
You gotta think twice.
Vegetarians think just once.
Vegans don't think at all.
Eco-activists think thrice.
Eco-terrorists think four times.
No comments:
Post a Comment